The Science Behind Humidity, Comfort, and Microbial Growth Indoors

A multidisciplinary investigation into how indoor moisture levels influence human health, building materials, and biological stability

Abstract

Indoor humidity is often viewed as a comfort factor, yet its impact extends far beyond thermal perception. Relative humidity (RH) influences the growth of microbes, the persistence of pollutants, and the integrity of building materials. This article examines the scientific interplay between humidity and indoor air quality (IAQ), exploring how deviations from the ideal RH range (typically 40–60%) affect occupant wellbeing, allergen proliferation, and microbial ecology. Drawing from building physics, immunology, and environmental microbiology, it explains why humidity must be treated as a core parameter,  not an afterthought,  in the design and operation of healthy indoor spaces.

1. Introduction

What does it mean to say a room "feels right"? For many, comfort is intuitive,  neither too dry nor too damp,  but this sensation has deep physiological and microbial underpinnings. Humidity affects not only our perception of air, but also how pathogens travel, how building materials age, and how pollutants persist or dissipate. In indoor environments, where natural humidity balance is disrupted by insulation, artificial heating, and sealed construction, these effects can quickly compound. The central question explored here is: how does humidity influence indoor health, air quality, and microbial dynamics, and what does science say about controlling it within safe boundaries?

2. The Physiology of Humidity and Human Comfort

The human body is acutely sensitive to moisture content in the air. When indoor RH drops below 30%, mucous membranes in the eyes, nose, and throat dry out, reducing the effectiveness of natural immune defenses. This increases vulnerability to respiratory infections, particularly from viruses such as influenza and SARS-CoV-2. Conversely, when RH exceeds 60%, thermal discomfort increases and the body's ability to cool via sweat evaporation decreases, leading to lethargy and heat stress. Studies such as those by Arundel et al. (1986) and ASHRAE guidelines consistently support a mid-range humidity zone,  typically 40–60%,  as optimal for human comfort and immunity. This range also minimizes the risk of electrostatic discharge, which can interfere with sensitive electronics and create ozone

.

3. Humidity and Pathogen Viability

Humidity strongly affects the viability and transmission of airborne pathogens. In low-humidity environments, respiratory droplets evaporate rapidly, shrinking into aerosols that remain suspended for hours and travel farther. This has been confirmed by research from Noti et al. (2013), which found that influenza virus infectivity was significantly higher at RH below 40%. In contrast, high humidity supports the growth of bacteria and fungi on surfaces, particularly in porous materials like drywall and carpeting. Mold species such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Stachybotrys thrive in environments with RH above 65%, especially when coupled with surface condensation. These organisms release spores and microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs), which are associated with asthma, allergic rhinitis, and neurological symptoms. Thus, humidity acts as both a direct and indirect regulator of indoor biological risk.

4. Building Materials and Moisture Retention

Beyond biological effects, humidity influences how buildings age and function. Excess moisture accelerates the degradation of wood, causes corrosion in metal fixtures, and promotes the delamination of adhesives and paints. Hygroscopic materials such as gypsum board and insulation can absorb water vapor, becoming long-term microbial reservoirs if not properly dried. This was shown in a 2011 study by the Building Science Corporation, which found that improperly ventilated buildings with RH above 70% had significantly higher microbial contamination within wall cavities and HVAC ducts. Low humidity is also problematic, leading to shrinkage and cracking in wooden materials, increased dust suspension, and faster wear on textiles. This dual sensitivity to both extremes requires that humidity control be dynamically managed,  not statically set.

5. Interaction with Pollutants and Airborne Chemistry

Humidity also modulates the behavior of chemical pollutants. VOCs such as formaldehyde and acetaldehyde off-gas more readily in high-humidity conditions due to increased vapor pressure and surface interaction. Ozone chemistry indoors, which produces secondary pollutants like formaldehyde and ultrafine particles, is also influenced by RH levels. Nazaroff and Weschler (2004) demonstrated that ozone's reactions with skin oils and surfaces intensified at higher RH, leading to greater formation of byproducts harmful to respiratory health. On the other hand, extremely dry environments may increase static buildup and particle resuspension, exacerbating PM exposure. In this way, humidity is not a neutral background variable but a catalyst that shapes pollutant lifecycles and interactions.

6. The Role of Ventilation and Indoor Humidity Control

Managing humidity is not a matter of humidifiers and dehumidifiers alone. Effective control involves coordinated ventilation, real-time sensing, and adaptive building design. Heat Recovery Ventilators (HRVs) and Energy Recovery Ventilators (ERVs) can balance humidity exchange while minimizing energy loss. Meanwhile, smart sensors linked to Building Management Systems (BMS) allow for zone-specific humidity control based on occupancy, outdoor conditions, and activity levels. A study by Sekhar and Olesen (2012) in tropical climates found that integrating humidity-aware BMS controls reduced both energy costs and reported SBS symptoms among occupants. Moreover, integrating humidity sensing with IAQ systems enables synergistic responses,  for example, boosting air exchange when both VOCs and RH rise simultaneously.

7. Conclusion

Humidity is more than a comfort variable. It is a central regulator of indoor health, microbial activity, material longevity, and air chemistry. The idea that 40–60% RH is “ideal” is not arbitrary; it is grounded in decades of interdisciplinary research spanning medicine, engineering, and building science. Managing indoor humidity requires an integrated approach that recognizes its role as a biological and chemical mediator, not just a thermal preference. In the design of future-ready buildings,  especially those aiming for wellness certification, pandemic resilience, or ecological balance,  humidity should be monitored with the same priority as temperature or carbon dioxide. Only when we align environmental controls with biological thresholds can we create indoor ecosystems that support rather than challenge human health.

To learn how responsive indoor systems are now incorporating humidity balance into real-time air quality ecosystems, visit: www.justbreathe.in